Between the two of these supplements, I am having a hard time trying to determine which one is more suited for blocking advanced glycation end products.
#1
Posted 14 June 2014 - 05:19 PM
#2
Posted 14 June 2014 - 05:54 PM
L.e. Mitochondrial energy optimizer is a great product too look into just about every ingredient has an Age related benefit , I don't take it anymore due too the inclusion of carnosine and a trivial amount of supplementary calcium ( neither one of these sups has a positive reaction on me after a week or so )
And the label on the bottle is a great place too start looking for some Age or Rage support supplementally speaking
#3
Posted 14 June 2014 - 06:38 PM
I don't take it anymore due too the inclusion of carnosine and a trivial amount of supplementary calcium ( neither one of these sups has a positive reaction on me after a week or so )
What kind of reaction could you possibly have after a week or so of calcium and carnosine? Pretty bizarre.
#4
Posted 14 June 2014 - 06:53 PM
And calcium would only strengthen any kind of anxiogenic response I got
#5
Posted 14 June 2014 - 09:43 PM
Sometime I look at this site to check the best evidence based level effect of supplements:
http://examine.com/s...ents/Berberine/
Between the two I would bet on berberine as it looks more solidly reducing A1C. I never used it though. I am using some benfotiamine but at low doses for some limited evidence of increased cancer risk.
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: anti-glycation
Science & Health →
Supplements →
Plant-Derived Agents with Anti-Glycation Activity. Some stronger than AminoguanidineStarted by Logic , 07 May 2013 plant-derived agents and 1 more... |
|
|
4 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users