Flossing may overall be more of a risk to health than a benefit.
The first study shows that flossing can readily cause oral bacteria to enter the bloodstream(bacteraemia.) Second study showed that the scientific evidence does not support oral health benefits from flossing.
1. J Clin Periodontol. 2009 Apr;36(4):323-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01372.x.
Epub 2009 Mar 11.
Bacteraemia due to dental flossing.
Crasta K(1), Daly CG, Mitchell D, Curtis B, Stewart D, Heitz-Mayfield LJ.
Author information:
(1)Discipline of Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Sydney, NSW,
Australia.
AIMS: The aims of this study were to (1) investigate the incidence of bacteraemia
following flossing in subjects with chronic periodontitis or periodontal health;
(2) identify the micro-organisms in detected bacteraemias; and (3) identify any
patient or clinical factors associated with such bacteraemia.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Baseline blood samples were obtained from 30 individuals
with chronic periodontitis (17 M:13 F, 29-75 years) and 30 with periodontal
health (17 M:13 F, 28-71 years) following a non-invasive examination. Each
subject's teeth were then flossed in a standardized manner and blood samples
obtained 30 s and 10 min. after flossing cessation. Blood samples were cultured
in a BACTEC system and positive samples subcultured for identification.
RESULTS: Forty per cent of periodontitis subjects and 41% of periodontally
healthy subjects tested positive for bacteraemia following flossing. Viridans
streptococci, which are commonly implicated in infective endocarditis (IE), were
isolated from 19% of positive subjects and accounted for 35% of microbial
isolates. Twenty per cent of subjects had a detectable bacteraemia at 10 min.
post-flossing. No patient or clinical factors were significantly associated with
post-flossing bacteraemia.
CONCLUSIONS: Dental flossing can produce bacteraemia in periodontally healthy and
periodontally diseased individuals at a rate comparable with that caused by some
dental treatments for which antibiotic prophylaxis is given to prevent IE.
PMID: 19426179 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
http://www.ncbi.nlm....pubmed/19426179
-
-
-
1. Int J Dent Hyg. 2008 Nov;6(4):265-79. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2008.00336.x.
The efficacy of dental floss in addition to a toothbrush on plaque and parameters
of gingival inflammation: a systematic review.
Berchier CE(1), Slot DE, Haps S, Van der Weijden GA.
Author information:
(1)School of Dental Hygiene, INHOLLAND University for Applied Sciences, Amsterdam,
The Netherlands.
Comment in
Int J Dent Hyg. 2008 Nov;6(4):251-2.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess systematically the adjunctive
effect of both flossing and toothbrushing versus toothbrushing alone on plaque
and gingivitis.
MATERIALS: The MEDLINE and Cochrane Central register of Controlled Trials
(CENTRAL) databases were searched through December 2007 to identify appropriate
studies. The variables of plaque and gingivitis were selected as outcomes.
RESULTS: Independent screening of titles and abstracts of 1166 MEDLINE-Pubmed and
187 Cochrane papers resulted in 11 publications that met the eligibility
criteria. Mean values and SD were collected by data extraction. Descriptive
comparisons are presented for brushing alone or brushing and flossing. A greater
part of the studies did not show a benefit for floss on plaque and clinical
parameters of gingivitis. A meta-analysis was performed for the plaque index and
gingival index.
CONCLUSIONS: The dental professional should determine, on an individual patient
basis, whether high-quality flossing is an achievable goal. In light of the
results of this comprehensive literature search and critical analysis, it is
concluded that a routine instruction to use floss is not supported by scientific
evidence.
PMID: 19138178 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
http://www.ncbi.nlm....pubmed/19138178
Edited by Brett Black, 15 October 2014 - 02:44 AM.