I don't understand how that validates anything?
If the spectral library doesn't exist publicly for Dihexa, then you can only compare your compound
to the spectra of what you believe to be the spectra for Dihexa.
And unless you got the spectra or some reference standard material from Harding himself, then the
structure you are "aware" of for Dihexa (against which you are going to compare the compound you
are selling and which people will obviously be putting into their bodies) can only be the structure of a
compound you believe to be Dihexa, based on information a supplier has provided, or a 3rd party lab
has produced from analysis of a compound which your supplier produced.
But it is impossible to know for sure that the compound from which your awareness of the structure was
obtained in the first place, was in actual fact really Dihexa.
Unless you are going to spend thousands of dollars in reverse engineering your compound to establish
its exact structure, then I don't understand how you can know for sure that it is 'the' Dihexa that Harding
produced.
Yes, IF the Spectral library is available for the compound, for comparison.
But is the Spectral library published/available for Dihexa?
I don't know that it is.
Even if there isn't a preexisting spec in the library. We are aware of the structure of Dihexa and can determine if the peaks correctly correspond to the structure.