I re-read this paper the other day and came upon this quote. Would it be correct to say that C60 works in the same way? Does it squench electrophiles of every major specie or only truly oxygen based ROS?
Here, we test the OS hypothesis of aging by studying the
effects on life-span of an artificial hydroxylamine scavenger
(IAC). IAC reacts with most—if not all—carbon, nitrogen
and oxygen reactive species of biological interest (including
peroxyl radicals (ROO*) and superoxide radical-anion
[O2*-] and was recently found to attenuate oxidative
diseases where OS has a pathophysiological role (17–19).
Unlike conventional antioxidants, IAC has an additional
action: upon quenching ROS, it becomes super-activated,
turning from a hydroxylamine to a nitroxide—an even more
potent and catalytic antioxidant (20,21; Scheme 1).
Hence, its antioxidant behavior is modulated by redox
homeostasis.
To answer my own post I guess there is this paper. I'm not sure if it covers all the relevant ROS/RNS/RCS that exist though. I tried tracking the publications of these reserachers but googling chinese names is not an easy thing.
The scavenging of reactive oxygen species and the potential for cell protection
by functionalized fullerene materials
Jun-Jie Yin b,1, Fang Lao a,1, Peter P. Fu d, Wayne G. Wamer b, Yuliang Zhao a,c,*, Paul C. Wang f, Yang Qiu a,
Baoyun Sun c, Gengmei Xing c, Jinquan Dong c, Xing-Jie Liang a,**, Chunying Chen a,c,*
a Division of Nanomedicine and Nanobiology, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology of China, Beijing 100190, China
b Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD 20740, USA
c Laboratory for Bio-Environmental Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
d Division of Biochemical Toxicology, National Center for Toxicological Research, Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, AR 72079, USA
f Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Howard University, Washington, DC 20060, USAa b s t r a c t
We demonstrated that three different types of water-soluble fullerenes materials can intercept all of the
major physiologically relevant ROS. C60(C(COOH)2)2, C60(OH)22, and Gd@C82(OH)22 can protect cells
against H2O2-induced oxidative damage, stabilize the mitochondrial membrane potential and reduce
intracellular ROS production with the following relative potencies: Gd@C82(OH)22 C60(OH)22>
C60(C(COOH)2)2. Consistent with their cytoprotective abilities, these derivatives can scavenge the stable
2,2-diphenyl-1-picryhydrazyl radical (DPPH), and the reactive oxygen species (ROS) superoxide radical
anion (O2 ), singlet oxygen, and hydroxyl radical (HO), and can also efficiently inhibit lipid peroxidation
in vitro. The observed differences in free radical-scavenging capabilities support the hypothesis that both
chemical properties, such as surface chemistry induced differences in electron affinity, and physical
properties, such as degree of aggregation, influence the biological and biomedical activities of functionalized
fullerenes. This represents the first report that different types of fullerene derivatives can
scavenge all physiologically relevant ROS. The role of oxidative stress and damage in the etiology and
progression of many diseases suggests that these fullerene derivatives may be valuable in vivo cytoprotective
and therapeutic agents.