This makes me very angry. How about you give her some damn respect? If she's cognitively "very sharp for her age" then allow her to make her own decisions! It's her body, it's her life. It seems like such a disrespectful and deceitful move to covertly put drugs into her food, and a breach of trust - made even worse if she feels dependent upon you. Not only that, it could be dangerous too. The stance of your Grandma, to only take doctor-prescribed medicine is reasonable and makes a lot of sense; whereas blindly experimenting with poorly-evidenced unregulated supplements has a whole lot of reasons going against it.
Would you care to share anything to support your opinion (i.e. contribute something useful)? Or are you just trying to show some kind of moral superiority? In what way is it dangerous? If your concern was for my Grandmother you would share said dangers rather than making emotionally charged blanket statements.
The stance of your Grandma, to only take doctor-prescribed medicine is reasonable and makes a lot of sense
Reasonable in what regard, and to what end? Are you not aware that iatrogenic deaths are #3 on the list of all deaths in America where I live? I would say that sentence is highly irresponsible, but to your credit you didn't bother to deal in specifics- so maybe what makes sense to you is a premature death?
Poorly Evidenced
- Explain. Seems like a subjective statement. What constitutes 'poor evidence' and for what condition/s?
Dhea is not a drug. I would hope you know that. DHEA is a hormone and it declines with age. Did you mean to type: "It seems such a disrespectful and deceitful move to covertly restore her hormone levels to a more youthful level, whereby she may feel better and lead a more enjoyable life for the last handful of years she has left."?
Unregulated supplements
- No supplements are regulated; that's redundant. Is your premise that unregulated substances are safer than regulated ones? I hope not, because you'd be sadly mistaken and need to do a little more homework.
...has a whole lot of reasons going against it.
That's a nice summary statement had you provided even one of those said reasons.
Here's my summary statement: Seems to me like you have some personal issues which my post may have triggered, and instead of providing a rational and helpful response, you chose to take the opportunity to take pot-shot at someone who is trying to improve the life of his family member.
I could go on to show how your moral compass only points north from where you're standing, and debate the ethics of interveining medically when someone needs it without their knowledge... But that would be a waste of my time. What I won't do is pretend that your post wasn't really about you and your need to stroke your ego, rather than my Grandma. So, you've received the attention you were looking for. Hope you feel better... now piss off.
* I had to come come back and edit this after somehow initially overlooking the fact that you didn't even bother to read the short thread before spouting off. Had you done so, you would have read that she agreed to take the supplements and I obviously DID ask her. But your were too busy focused on yourself and your opinion to bother with actually reading were'nt you. Your lazy, confrontational and ignorant reply should be your utmost concern at this point. You've got a long road ahead of you before your ready to start passing moral judgements.
Edited by Fletch, 28 August 2015 - 05:29 AM.