yes. It also shows that the dose of 2 capsules which is reported as 50 Mg NMN is accurate. Good luck.
i'm curious who would pay almost 3 times more for Revgenetics' NMN than NR since the person would almost have to know about NR and the commonly held belief that one is not more effective than the other.
My guess is, some people read the press releases about NMN and don't realize NR is likely as effective.
Or maybe some folks have a lot of money and figure might as well give it a try, since we're not really sure about the science?
Its close to 10x the cost of NR if you compare the 60 capsules of 250mg that alivebynature charges $40 in their 6 pack, vs $38 for 60 capsules of 25 mg NMN.
Thank you. Is there any data comparing effectiveness of NMN and NR you are aware of?
Samuel Trammels thesis had some statements about the superiority of NR, but I admit I take those with a grain of salt as his advisor, Dr Brenner, has an obvious bias for NR.
Re-reading the thesis now, it looks like the intention is to prove the superiority of NR.
NOVEL NAD+ METABOLOMIC TECHNOLOGIES AND THEIR APPLICATIONS TO NICOTINAMIDE RIBOSIDE INTERVENTIONS
“In chapter 4, we establish that NR is a superior NAD+ precursor compared to NMN using stable isotope labeling technologies “
“we report for the first time that NR is a far superior effector in NAD+ metabolism, increasing both hepatic NAD+ and NAAD to a greater extent compared to NA and Nam“
I came back to the question of NR vs NMN myself when I noticed these 2 below recently released studies on Mice models of Freidriechs Ataxia.
If I’m reading them correctly, it seems like NMN restored heart function, while NR failed in nearly the same situation.
Nicotinamide mononucleotide requires SIRT3 to improve cardiac function and bioenergetics in a Friedreich’s ataxia cardiomyopathy model
“Remarkably, NMN administered to FXN-KO mice restores cardiac function to near-normal levels. “
NAD+ replacement therapy with nicotinamide riboside does not improve cardiac function in a model of mitochondrial heart disease
“In conclusion, NAD+ supplementation with NR in the FRDA model of mitochondrial heart disease does not alter SIRT3 activity or improve cardiac function.”