It's actually not like that similar to those other peptides you mention because we are asking them to produce a retro-inverso peptide. Retro-inverso peptides are much less common and require different synthesis methods.
So if a lab doesn't have good experience with these, they are likely to have quite a learning curve.
Because of this, it's also likely that whatever Darren Moore is using isn't really the compound that was studied.
Basically it boils down to this: You're spending a lot of money and injecting something into your veins that you hope will reverse aging. Do you try to get the cheap version that may or may not be the actual compound, or do you pay more and thereby assure that you're getting what you want?
Trying to save a few dollars and risking your life (either risking it actually in that an incorrect polypeptide could be dangerous, or risking it indirectly in that you are not getting the anti-aging benefit you could have received) seems the definition of "penny wise, pound foolish" or "false economy" to me.
The same cannot be said about any other company at this time.
You sound like all the other companies have no idea what they are doing.
The chemical structure is pretty well detailed in the study so most reputable labs can handle its synthesis.
It is a 46 AA-long peptide roughly what is Thymosin beta 4 (43) which is offered by many.
For comparison, HGH is 191 AA- long so there may be some concerns with the synthesis by any but truly pharma grade labs.
FWIW I think 100mg of FOXO4DRI would be insufficient for any significant results so it is an expensive test most probably doomed to fail due to inadequate dosage/duration.
By his own admission, Darren Moore have already injected way more than that without reported major results/benefits.
Edited by smithx, 07 December 2017 - 07:17 AM.
LongeCity
