So... Now I guess they will need to find a way to protect the patient from solar and extrasolar radiation. If they can do that, they'll be able to preserve patients much more indefinitely than by using liquid nitrogen (LN2).
Posted 26 August 2017 - 09:43 PM
So... Now I guess they will need to find a way to protect the patient from solar and extrasolar radiation. If they can do that, they'll be able to preserve patients much more indefinitely than by using liquid nitrogen (LN2).
Posted 30 August 2017 - 05:12 PM
Posted 30 August 2017 - 09:33 PM
Posted 31 August 2017 - 11:24 PM
You seem to be coming from a very negative angle. It may be that nothing comes of this or it could be a disaster but it is not like it will affect you. Much loved Musk took a similar approach by tapping the rich first before moving to a more affordable car. Getting a bunch of Russian billionaires to fund this may well be the way to go. I think the ideal would be to store the patients in the shadow of the earth, not sure if that is possible but it would deal with solar radiation and temperature variations.
I was thinking they'd go with a modular storage system and make it part of a space station, leaving those patients in conventional storage for the time being until electromagnetic launch circuits made it inexpensive. I don't think it will involve conventional rocketry.
In the US, the per kg cost of payload into space is $20,200, a 100 kg whole body payload (leaving room for packing materials) would still be inline with 'the works' at Alcor. I've heard it costs less per kg in Russia, so it would come in at less than $202,000 + Space Station fee + KrioRus standard costs.
The cool thing is that someone is offering it. It's about time.
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users