Life Extension Two-per-Day, but neither of the "complete" multivitamins, so I couldn't cast a vote
Why Two-per-Day? Because in my opinion, Thorne is a bit too high in certain nutrients at full dose, and too low for others at 1/2 dose. Two-per-Day is too high in most nutrients at full dose and just fine at 1/2 dose, which costs 15 cents per day (or ~10 if you get it during sale). Honestly, I wouldn't spend much more on a multivitamin.
I think those comprehensive formulas with all kinds of plant extracts are just a waste of money, and may even tempt people to care less about eating a healthy diet ("well, I have taken all those capsules full of vitamins and plant extracts, so why shouldn't I have that burger now?") and thereby even excert a net negative effect. Don't forget that there is a lot more to a healthy diet than what even the most comprehensive and expensive pills and powders provide and that the only really conclusive evidence we have for the health-promoting effects of all those compounds is for their natural, whole-food form, supplying them in complex combinations and accompanied by an equally complex mixture of dietary fiber, that may be even more important than the phytochemicals and which those supplements are usually completely devoid of.
My advice: take a good, basic multivitamin (like Two-per-Day @ 1/2 dose) instead of the expensive formulas and spent the money you save on healthy food. You get potentially more benefit from that. Even if money is not an issue for you, be wary of your subconsciousness if you take those supplements.
Of course there a certain phytochemicals that may have promising effects on doses much higher than those achievable through a healthy diet, but that's a different story. To reach the required dose, you would have to take them as a seperate supplement anyway.
Edited by timar, 23 October 2017 - 09:44 PM.