I talked to a dermatologist not long ago who told me that lipo was actually permanent and that the fat doesn't come back. Now, I'm thinking, why isn't it approved as a treatment for diabetes, arthritis, and so many of the other diseases that fat loss can help? Is it just the mindset of the people selling it? It would seem to me that combining lipo with other meds or therapies for moderating food intake after the fat isn't there to tell the brain to keep eating. Why has this technology remained so taboo?
Does liposuction, cosmetic or otherwise improve disease?
#1
Posted 28 October 2017 - 03:33 PM
#2
Posted 13 November 2017 - 04:14 PM
Furthermore, does it reduce estrogen production since it is dependent upon fatty tissue?
#3
Posted 13 November 2017 - 06:21 PM
I would think that it absolutely does decrease estrogen. The more I've thought about it, the more I don't see why it shouldn't be covered given how much money it will save moving forward.
#4
Posted 15 November 2017 - 01:01 PM
There was talk that you could simply inject certain natural chemicals like phosphatidylcholine into fatty tissue to permanently prevent fat storage there. I was looking to try it myself but curious why it is not done more often. If it proved to be possible then it could save a lot of time and effort trying to lose weight once in a while after binging on food.
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: plastic surgery
Science & Health →
Lifestyle →
Ageless Looks →
"too much work"...?Started by blood , 30 Nov 2017 plastic, surgery, plastic surgery and 3 more... |
|
|
4 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users