
(Custom Nutrition Warehouse)
THanks!
Matt
Posted 16 May 2005 - 05:43 PM
Posted 21 July 2005 - 08:03 PM
Posted 22 July 2005 - 06:20 AM
Posted 05 September 2005 - 03:09 AM
Does anyone know a good supplier of phenibut in bulk or quantity? Just for personal use but I'd like to stock up before they take it off the market. I've tried all the ones on the list and they were out. I tried google and froogle and same thing except a couple that had it under a different name with a high price for a small bottle.
Posted 05 September 2005 - 10:40 PM
Posted 09 September 2005 - 11:04 PM
Posted 16 September 2005 - 03:49 AM
Posted 16 September 2005 - 04:10 AM
Posted 16 September 2005 - 09:06 AM
Anyone with phenibut in stock right now?!
Posted 05 December 2005 - 08:55 AM
Posted 14 January 2006 - 10:27 AM
In regards to Relentless Improvement, Smart Nutrition, and Unique Nutrition each companies produces their own products (as dietary supplements) and have self determined what price they wish to sell it at....for IAS and QHI however they just distribute those products from drug companies that are regulated so the prices are far higher.
Posted 20 January 2006 - 01:38 AM
Posted 13 February 2006 - 06:28 PM
Bromocriptine 2.5 mg , 40 tabs $20 , 100 tabs $35 , 1000 tabs $200 ..Bromocriptine documented to increase GH secretion & seks drive , reverse progesterone induced nut shrinkage , gyno and limp dick associated with adrol , deca , tren , taking anti-Estrogen with these steroids is futile
Posted 13 February 2006 - 11:09 PM
Posted 25 February 2006 - 10:32 PM
Posted 05 March 2006 - 02:52 PM
Posted 05 March 2006 - 05:30 PM
Posted 05 March 2006 - 05:39 PM
Posted 20 March 2006 - 11:47 PM
Posted 03 April 2006 - 07:16 AM
Posted 11 May 2006 - 07:23 AM
Posted 11 May 2006 - 08:16 AM
Posted 11 May 2006 - 05:07 PM
Edited by nootropikamil, 11 March 2007 - 07:11 AM.
Posted 12 May 2006 - 07:20 AM
Posted 12 May 2006 - 05:53 PM
Posted 12 May 2006 - 08:45 PM
Quality
- Lack of government regulation (i.e. no requirement for companies to follow Good Manufacturing Practices) coupled with poor quality control of the manufacturing process leads to a situation in which the amount of active ingredient in the bottle may be significantly different from the amount specified on the label.
- A study of ginseng products found tremendous variability, with as little as 12% and as much as 328% of the active ingredient in the bottle, compared to the information on the label (Am J Clin Nutr. 2001. 73. 1101-1106).
- A study of 59 Echinacea products from retail stores analyzed by thin layer chromatography showed that 6 contained no measurable Echinacea and only 9 of the 21 preparations labelled as standardized extracts actually contained in the sample the content listed on the label. Overall, the assay results were consistent with the labelled content in only 31 of the59 preparations (Arch Intern Med. 2003. 163. 699-704).
- When the FDA announced in 2003 a proposed rule to establish good manufacturing practices for supplements, the FDA cited data that 5 of 18 soy and/or red clover supplements contained only 50-80% of the quantity of isoflavones stated on the label, and 8 of 25 probiotic products contained less than 1% of the live bacteria claimed on the label.
- Quality really should start with Good Agricultural Practices (GAP�s).
- Quality concerns with regard to laboratory testing (Integrative Medicine. 2006. 5 [1]. 34-37 and 5[2]. 38-41).
- The Certificate of Analysis (COA) for raw material unfortunately is often just a certificate of content and may NOT accurately reflect the true content of the raw material.
- Neither manufacturers� in house labs nor contract labs are regulated.
- Problems that exist with laboratory testing include dry labbing (lab reports a desirable result without ever performing the analysis), method rigging (lab alters the method of testing to produce a desirable result), and use of poor-quality reference standards (use of reagent grade chemicals rather than a primary or a secondary standard).
- There are in 2006 very few fully validated laboratory methodologies for analytical testing of botanicals.
-Additional quality issues include contamination of some herbs with other botanicals, micro-organisms, microbial toxins, fumigating agents, pesticides, heavy metals, or prescription or over the counter drugs.
* In 1998 the California Department of Health reported in a letter published in the New England Journal of Medicine that 32% of Asian patent medicines sold in that state contained undeclared pharmaceuticals or heavy metals, including ephedrine ( a stimulant), chlorpheniramine (an antihistamine), methyltestosterone (an anabolic steroid), phenacetin (a pain killer), lead, mercury, and arsenic (N Engl J Med. 1998. 339. 847).
* A study in which 500 Asian patent medicines were screened for the presence of heavy metals and 134 drugs found that 10% were contaminated (Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2000. 65. 112-119).
* A study in which all unique Ayurvedic herbal medicine products were purchased from all stores within 20 miles of Boston City Hall found that 14 of 70 products (20%) contained heavy metals and that if taken as recommended by the manufacturer, each of these 14 products could result in heavy metal intakes above published regulatory standards (JAMA. 2004. 292. 2868-2873).
* Adulteration of imported Chinese dietary supplements sold in Japan is responsible for 622 cases of illness, 148 hospitalizations, and 3 deaths (Report of the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare. September 20, 2002).
* A 2002 Bastyr University study of 20 probiotic supplements found that 16 contained bacteria not listed on the label, 6 contained organisms that can make people sick, and 4 contained no live organisms.
* PC-SPES was removed from the market in 2002 after it was determined that it was adulterated with the prescription blood thinner, warfarin.
Edited by nootropikamil, 11 March 2007 - 07:15 AM.
Posted 20 May 2006 - 02:05 AM
Posted 20 May 2006 - 02:43 AM
Posted 20 May 2006 - 03:06 AM
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users